|
TRAINING QUALITY STANDARDS
Especially if its their first time entry into employment which is supposed to be the foundation level of the skills required by the company aims. A manager should be able to make these decisions if not why then are they in management for. Why would any company consider hiring an unqualified person even from networked sources. Wouldn't it be better to the person to say honestly what skills they lack for the work. Rather than a vague idea of what standards of work is required on the job. For this could cost the company the "core" area of the business when required for future developments so a person needs the basic career structure as well as knowing what drives the business onwards. The lack of this planning goes back to career advisors not extending their positions and responsibilities towards employees and companies, so many employees drift through their work thinking they are doing it correct and isn't in their best interest nor the business organisations. Also if the best qualified applicants don't meet a companies needs at that moment wouldn't it be best to employ them into another area of the company for them to develop another skill they could learn thus becoming a valuable asset, professional and fill a future vacancy requirement by any having calculated this into the personnel plan as a first option rather than an external candidate who might not understand the company culture. What would this concept cost the business? For the cost of training an employee plus the time it takes is it really making the company profitable at the end of the working day not to plan into the strategy regarding a career development programmes for employee? When the cost of training the basic skills for companies to get an employee to a certain level ~ those companies who do not invest in training advance skills to those personnel who show the ability for future growth because its spending the training budget on the entry level staff only. So it seems to be wasteless and futile in employee endeavours but also money that could make a company and employees grow. Is it employers don't want to push the employees to work more productivity. Well if the managers actually owned the business perhaps they would have a different attitude towards standards of work produced and find a better way of working. Also with advanced skills and qualifications the employee can move into the next cycle of growth due to competing globally if not company's will struggle to find candidates at suitable levels of competency that match the job skill requirement standards even at higher level of management. The point I am making is: "...its impossible to master any art of science at once. Instead, to excel at anything one must patiently wrestle with it until it gives up its secret..."(1) That's what rising standards of work and career developing counts for a business almost every day not just the operative quality for a company. REFERENCE SOURCE: (1) Make It So by Wess Roberts and Bill Ross.
|